%%

The author's argument is based on the idea that there is a difference between being in nature and experiencing nature. For example, a traveler passing through a forest may see the trees and the animals, but they may not truly experience the forest. To experience the forest, the traveler must engage with it on a deeper level. This can be done by spending time in the forest, observing the details of the environment, and reflecting on the meaning of the forest. What is the most likely reason why the author uses this example?

SAT · English · previous-year question

  1. A.illustrate the idea that experiencing nature requires more than simply observing it.correct
  2. B.argue that the traveler is not truly experiencing nature because they are not spending enough time in the forest.
  3. C.suggest that the forest is a place of great beauty and wonder.
  4. D.compare the traveler’s experience of the forest to the experiences of others.

Answer

A. illustrate the idea that experiencing nature requires more than simply observing it.

Explanation

The author is using the example of the traveler to make a distinction between simply seeing something and truly experiencing it. The example suggests that experiencing nature requires more than simply observing it; it requires a deeper level of engagement with the environment.

Practice more SAT questions

Answer thousands more real SAT previous-year questions free, get graded instantly, and climb the global ranked leaderboard.

Practice SAT free →

More SAT English questions